* *** POSTMORTEM_2009-10-06 TXT - 9 Oct 2009 11:21:34 - JKNAUTH Postmortem on 10/6/09 Election at Precinct 01-43 ========== == ======= ======== == ======== ===== The 10/6/09 election was pretty quiet at Precinct 01-43. Here are some comments. 1) In contrast to the way other laptops have worked, the SOSA program did not start automatically when our laptop was booted. I had to doubleclick on the SOSA icon on the desktop to start the program. I notified our coordinator. I suspect SOSA was just not in the Startup folder for some reason, but I didn't check. Once the doubleclick was done, things appeared as they did in Appendix H and the laptop class. 2) I once hit the backspace slowdown problem I had seen last year. I rebooted and didn't see the problem again. 3) We had one case where two ballots were stuck together and appeared as one. The M100 caught it. This had happened once last year. 4) We opened two ballot packets. Both contained 100 ballots. Last year three of nine packets were one ballot short. 5) The alarm on the scanner is so quiet that it is easily missed, especially if the room is noisy and someone isn't sitting right beside the scanner. 6) The press-to-talk curbside speaker system is not as good as the previous doorbell system. Despite the sign, people had a tendency to just push the button and immediately release it, as if it were a doorbell. That results in a missed curbside alert. 7) The colored flowcharts and provisional ballot 10-step chart (PTO class handouts) were hard to read. Lighter colors should be used. The heavy, white, two-sided flowchart sheet distributed last year was very easy to use. 8) We eventually had to partially obscure the Automark with a voting booth. People had kept trying to use the Automark instead of the M100 to read their ballots. This was despite the big sign, which was clearly visible. Of course no one ever tried to use the Automark for its intended purpose. In fact no one has ever used the Automark at our precinct to mark a ballot (eight elections?), although it is always set up and (probably too) easily accessible. 9) At 01-43 we had several people come to our location from 02-04 (which is *far* away). The 02-04 precinct polling place was closed today since no elections applied there -- it is UNC and is district 3 for the school board. The people said a sign had told them to come to us. I would be curious exactly what that sign said. Were we the first obvious open polling place going south on Falls of Neuse in all those miles? Anyway we called the BOE to doublecheck why 02-04 wasn't available to these voters, as well as checking the laptop and seeing "No Ballot" and understanding what that meant from the laptop class. The voters understood the explanation and accepted it. The mystery is why did they show up on our particular doorstep. Or did many precincts get similar visitors who wanted to vote, didn't realize they had no elections to vote in, and just stopped in the first open polling place they found after seeing their normal polling place was closed? 10) Related to this, we had *many* valid 01-43 voters express surprise that there was no Board of Education race on the ballot in our precinct. We explained that District 6 wouldn't have an election until 2011. Given the great county-wide interest in the Board of Education elections this year, it isn't too surprising that people wanted to participate even though they couldn't and didn't realize it until they saw their ballot. If people don't check their sample ballots before election day, or know which races apply to them, such problems are bound to occur. At least people seemed to understand once it was explained. 11) Our Chief Judge said she found the checklists on the various bags to be very helpful, especially the EMC. Jeff Knauth Precinct 01-43